[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B02CC70.4050703@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:16:48 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
	dhowells@...hat.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, avi@...hat.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
	fweisbec@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/21] sched: implement scheduler notifiers
Hello,
11/17/2009 05:29 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>  we can have sleep/ready/run hooks instead.
> 
> I would much prefer that, sleep/ready are significantly different from
> deactivate/activate.
Alright, will update.
Thanks.
-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists