[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091118174602.GH25150@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:46:02 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hx4700: fix hx4700 touchscreen pressure values
On Wed 2009-11-18 09:39:34, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 06:28:49PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Wed 2009-11-18 00:22:41, Paul Parsons wrote:
> > > > Does pressure actually work as expected -- that is not inverted?
> > > > Because I need this patch on spitz... but it may break your
> > > > machine...
> > >
> > > You are right, the pressure values were being inverted on my hx4700.
> > > Pressing hard generates somewhat lower Rt values than pressing lightly.
> > >
> > > Since typical hx4700 Rt values are close to (pressure_max/2) anyway,
> > > the inverted and non-inverted values were not very different.
> > > For example:
> > >
> > > Rt ts->pressure_max-Rt
> > > 599 425
> > > 562 462
> > > 588 436
> > > 570 454
> > >
> > > So by all means submit your ads7846.c patch; it will not break hx4700.
> >
> > Dmitry, those pressure values are reverted on more than one machine,
> > and we do not have anyone reporting it works ok for them. Can we
> > perhaps just.... fix it?
>
> OK, so we have 4 instances where pressure is inverted and nobody wants
> to come out with a non-inverted example... I'll queue for .33 then - .32
> it too close to the release.
Yes, .33 makes sense. Thanks!
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists