linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hx4700: fix hx4700 touchscreen pressure values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:46:49 -0800
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Paul Parsons <lost.distance@...oo.com>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, rpurdie@...ys.net, lenz@...wisc.edu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dirk@...er-Online.de,
	arminlitzel@....de, metan@....cz, thommycheck@...il.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, dbaryshkov@...il.com,
	omegamoon@...il.com, eric.y.miao@...il.com, utx@...guin.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hx4700: fix hx4700 touchscreen pressure values

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:39:34AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 06:28:49PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Wed 2009-11-18 00:22:41, Paul Parsons wrote:
> > > > Does pressure actually work as expected -- that is not inverted?
> > > > Because I need this patch on spitz...  but it may break your
> > > > machine...
> > > 
> > > You are right, the pressure values were being inverted on my hx4700.
> > > Pressing hard generates somewhat lower Rt values than pressing lightly.
> > > 
> > > Since typical hx4700 Rt values are close to (pressure_max/2) anyway,
> > > the inverted and non-inverted values were not very different.
> > > For example:
> > > 
> > > Rt      ts->pressure_max-Rt
> > > 599     425
> > > 562     462
> > > 588     436
> > > 570     454
> > > 
> > > So by all means submit your ads7846.c patch; it will not break hx4700.
> > 
> > Dmitry, those pressure values are reverted on more than one machine,
> > and we do not have anyone reporting it works ok for them. Can we
> > perhaps just.... fix it?
> 
> OK, so we have 4 instances where pressure is inverted and nobody wants
> to come out with a non-inverted example... I'll queue for .33 then - .32
> it too close to the release.
> 

Btw, could you send me the latest version of your patch please?

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/