[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091118034450.GB17349@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:44:50 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, hpa@...or.com,
root@...aldomain.pl,
Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devpts_get_tty() should validate inode
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 06:35:43PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> devpts_get_tty() assumes that the inode passed in is associated with a valid
> pty. But if the only reference to the pty is via a bind-mount, the inode
> passed to devpts_get_tty() while valid, would refer to a pty that no longer
> exists.
>
> With a lot of debug effort, Grzegorz Nosek developed a small program (see
> below) to reproduce a crash on recent kernels. This crash is a regression
> introduced by the commit:
>
> commit 527b3e4773628b30d03323a2cb5fb0d84441990f
> Author: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>
> Date: Mon Oct 13 10:43:08 2008 +0100
>
> To fix, ensure that the dentry associated with the inode has not yet been
> deleted/unhashed by devpts_pty_kill().
>
> See also:
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2009-July/019273.html
Good debugging, I'll queue this up.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists