linux-kernel - [patch -mm] mm: slab allocate memory section nodemask for large systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:19:30 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>,
	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch -mm] mm: slab allocate memory section nodemask for large
 systems

Nodemasks should not be allocated on the stack for large systems (when it
is larger than 256 bytes) since there is a threat of overflow.

This patch causes the unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes() nodemask to be
allocated on the stack for smaller systems and be allocated by slab for
larger systems.

GFP_KERNEL is used since remove_memory_block() can block.

Cc: Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>
Cc: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
Cc: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
---
 drivers/base/node.c |   13 +++++++++----
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
--- a/drivers/base/node.c
+++ b/drivers/base/node.c
@@ -363,12 +363,16 @@ int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, int nid)
 /* unregister memory section under all nodes that it spans */
 int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk)
 {
-	nodemask_t unlinked_nodes;
+	NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, unlinked_nodes, GFP_KERNEL);
 	unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn;
 
-	if (!mem_blk)
+	if (!mem_blk) {
+		NODEMASK_FREE(unlinked_nodes);
 		return -EFAULT;
-	nodes_clear(unlinked_nodes);
+	}
+	if (!unlinked_nodes)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	nodes_clear(*unlinked_nodes);
 	sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->phys_index);
 	sect_end_pfn = sect_start_pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1;
 	for (pfn = sect_start_pfn; pfn <= sect_end_pfn; pfn++) {
@@ -379,13 +383,14 @@ int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk)
 			continue;
 		if (!node_online(nid))
 			continue;
-		if (node_test_and_set(nid, unlinked_nodes))
+		if (node_test_and_set(nid, *unlinked_nodes))
 			continue;
 		sysfs_remove_link(&node_devices[nid].sysdev.kobj,
 			 kobject_name(&mem_blk->sysdev.kobj));
 		sysfs_remove_link(&mem_blk->sysdev.kobj,
 			 kobject_name(&node_devices[nid].sysdev.kobj));
 	}
+	NODEMASK_FREE(unlinked_nodes);
 	return 0;
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/