[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091118001955.GB8187@nowhere>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:19:59 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Prasad <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7 v6] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite the hw-breakpoints
layer on top of perf events
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:30:43PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 16:28 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > @@ -643,6 +662,8 @@ struct perf_event {
> >
> > perf_callback_t callback;
> >
> > + perf_callback_t event_callback;
> > +
> > #endif /* CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS */
> > };
>
> And here you add another one.. which is 100% unused in this patch..
>
Oh, that must be a confusion when I rebased the patches. I'll remove it.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists