[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091119024008.GB15128@shareable.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:40:08 +0000
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>, Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, jkacur@...hat.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] BKL: Remove BKL from default_llseek()
Alan Cox wrote:
> O> But nowadays, even that doesn't happen. sys_read() and sys_write()
> > make a copy of f_pos using file_pos_read(), so drivers cannot see the
> > value change during the call - except for their own change.
> >
> > I find myself wondering why the VFS isn't responsible for the position
> > update instead of the driver... Would it be a valid cleanup to move
> > it from the driver to VFS?
>
> And how would you adjust it. Not all devices have a bytes read == offset
> relationship. The VFS doesn't know enough.
That was implicit in my question: Are there any seekable devices where
bytes read != offset delta, and if yes, is that correct behaviour, a
bug, or a silly interface that should go away?
-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists