linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: do not define acpi_processor_get_bios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091119180805.GA4386@ldl.fc.hp.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:08:05 -0700
From:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: do not define acpi_processor_get_bios_limit() in
	processor.h (snd ver)

* Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>:
> > 
> > There's 2-3 other fixes pending for the bios_limit patch.
> Alex removed the function that should have get
> static inline and that looks like the right fix for two
> mentioned problems.
> 
> > For now, I've dropped it from cpufreq.next, until Thomas sends
> > a rediffed version with the compilation problems fixed.
> Attached is my old version, merged with Alex's one.
> Alex drops out as author of the fix by that, hope that's ok
> with you.

That's fine, maybe do what akpm does...

[achiang@...com fix build breakage]
> CC: Pallipadi Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
> CC: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
> CC: davej@...emonkey.org.uk
> CC: linux@...inikbrodowski.net
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>

But either way is fine by me.

/ac
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/