[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091120171656.GI20634@shareable.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:16:56 +0000
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux-Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, jkacur@...hat.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Willem Riede <osst@...de.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] osst: Update ppos instead of using file->f_pos
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Jan Blunck wrote:
> > osst_read()/osst_write() modify file->f_pos directly instead of the ppos
> > given to them. The VFS later updates the file->f_pos and overwrites it
> > with the value of ppos.
>
> I notice st.c doesn't use or update file->f_pos (or *ppos), so
> userspace probably won't be caring about f_pos from osst.c (they're
> both SCSI tape drivers). And osst.c doesn't use the value, it just
> increases it with each transfer. It doesn't even reset the value to
> zero when rewinding the tape, so it's not that meaningful.
>
> So how about just removing those modifications to file->f_pos from osst.c?
Or alternatively, perhaps they are missing from st.c. I don't know,
but userspace can't have been all that dependent on the value :-)
-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists