[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091121051226.GA24399@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:12:26 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...et.ca>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] sysfs: Fix locking and factor out
sysfs_sd_setattr
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 04:07:11PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 11:27:04PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> >>
> >> Cleanly separate the work that is specific to setting the
> >> attributes of a sysfs_dirent from what is needed to update
> >> the attributes of a vfs inode.
> >>
> >> Additionally grab the sysfs_mutex to keep any nasties from
> >> surprising us when updating the sysfs_dirent.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
> >
> > Due to the extended attr work for sysfs that went into Linus's tree
> > recently, this patch doesn't apply at all anymore.
>
> It looks like the issue is the a trivial context conflict with
> sysfs-mark-a-locally-only-used-function-static.patch
Ah, sorry about that, I should have noticed that, I was looking for a
much harder problem :(
I'll go queue these up in a bit.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists