[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1aayg7nbk.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:07:11 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...et.ca>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/15] sysfs: Fix locking and factor out sysfs_sd_setattr
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 11:27:04PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>>
>> Cleanly separate the work that is specific to setting the
>> attributes of a sysfs_dirent from what is needed to update
>> the attributes of a vfs inode.
>>
>> Additionally grab the sysfs_mutex to keep any nasties from
>> surprising us when updating the sysfs_dirent.
>>
>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
>
> Due to the extended attr work for sysfs that went into Linus's tree
> recently, this patch doesn't apply at all anymore.
It looks like the issue is the a trivial context conflict with
sysfs-mark-a-locally-only-used-function-static.patch
Which marks one of those new functions as static.
Here come the patches 6-15 rebased on top of that.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists