[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1258826634l.13034l.0l@oscar.alarsen.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:03:54 +0100
From: Anders Larsen <al@...rsen.net>
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] Do not fallback to default_llseek() when
readdir() uses BKL
On 2009-11-20 17:40:43, Jan Blunck wrote:
> Do not use the fallback default_llseek() if the readdir operation of
> the
> filesystem still uses the big kernel lock. Since llseek() modifies
> file->f_pos of the directory directly it may need locking to not
> confuse
> readdir which usually uses file->f_pos directly as well. Since the
> special
> characteristics of the BKL (unlocked on schedule) are not necessary
> in this
> case, the inode mutex can be used for locking as provided by
> generic_file_llseek(). This is only possible since all filesystems,
> except
> reiserfs, either use a directory as a flat file or with disk address
> offsets. Reiserfs on the other hand uses a 32bit hash off the
> filename as
> the offset so generic_file_llseek() can get used as well since the
> hash is
> always smaller than sb->s_maxbytes (= (512 << 32) - blocksize).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
> ---
wrt fs/qnx4:
Acked-by: Anders Larsen <al@...rsen.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists