[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091123141754.GE8742@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:17:54 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
David Zeuthen <david@...ar.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device idle
changes
On Mon, Nov 23 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2009-11-18 20:07:12, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:03:21PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >
> > > Sure, but what's wrong with reading that file every 50 seconds? Almost
> > > all boxes poll for media changes of optical drives and usb card
> > > readers anyway, so it's not that we are not doing stuff like this
> > > already.
> >
> > We poll for media because there's no event-based way of avoiding it - in
> > this case there is.
>
> ...when you add overhead to every disk operation. I'd say that polling
> once in 50 seconds is preferable to that.
I have to agree, doing a mod_timer() on every single IO is going to suck
big time. I went to great lengths to avoid doing that even for timeout
detection. So that's pretty much a non-starter to begin with.
Additionally, as Bart also wrote, you are not doing this in the right
place. You want to do this post-merge, not for each incoming IO. Have
you looked at laptop mode? Looks like you are essentially re-inventing
that, but in a bad way.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists