[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091123142557.GA10084@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:25:57 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
David Zeuthen <david@...ar.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Add support for uevents on block device idle
changes
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 03:17:54PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I have to agree, doing a mod_timer() on every single IO is going to suck
> big time. I went to great lengths to avoid doing that even for timeout
> detection. So that's pretty much a non-starter to begin with.
It's conditional on a (default off) setting, so it's not a hit unless
the user requests it. But yeah, the performance hit is obviously a
concern. It may be that polling is the least bad way of doing this.
> Additionally, as Bart also wrote, you are not doing this in the right
> place. You want to do this post-merge, not for each incoming IO. Have
> you looked at laptop mode? Looks like you are essentially re-inventing
> that, but in a bad way.
Right, that's mostly down to my having no familiarity with the block
layer at all :) I can fix that up easily enough, but if a deferrable
timer is going to be too expensive then it'll need some rethinking
anyway.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists