linux-kernel - Re: [Bug 14658] Regression in efi.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1259110243.7068.8.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:50:43 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	indexer <indexer@...ernode.on.net>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug 14658] Regression in efi.c

Hi, William,

On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 08:35 +0800, indexer wrote: 
> To whom it may concern
> 
> I have redone the bisect and i believe the versions i originally stated 
> were wrong. I apologise for this mistake
> 
> commit 7bd867dfb4e0357e06a3211ab2bd0e714110def3
> Author: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
> Date:   Thu Sep 10 10:48:56 2009 +0800
> 
>     x86: Move get/set_wallclock to x86_platform_ops
>    
>     get/set_wallclock() have already a set of platform dependent
>     implementations (default, EFI, paravirt). MRST will add another
>     variant.
>    
>     Moving them to platform ops simplifies the existing code and minimizes
>     the effort to integrate new variants.

Now Legacy RTC code instead of EFI get/set_wallclock is used on x86_64.
Your test shows that before this patch, kernel can boot on your system,
but can not boot after that?

Best Regards,
Huang Ying


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/