[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B0C95B7.5070409@internode.on.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:55:59 +1030
From: indexer <indexer@...ernode.on.net>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug 14658] Regression in efi.c
Huang Ying wrote:
> Hi, William,
>
> On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 08:35 +0800, indexer wrote:
>
>> To whom it may concern
>>
>> I have redone the bisect and i believe the versions i originally stated
>> were wrong. I apologise for this mistake
>>
>> commit 7bd867dfb4e0357e06a3211ab2bd0e714110def3
>> Author: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
>> Date: Thu Sep 10 10:48:56 2009 +0800
>>
>> x86: Move get/set_wallclock to x86_platform_ops
>>
>> get/set_wallclock() have already a set of platform dependent
>> implementations (default, EFI, paravirt). MRST will add another
>> variant.
>>
>> Moving them to platform ops simplifies the existing code and minimizes
>> the effort to integrate new variants.
>>
>
> Now Legacy RTC code instead of EFI get/set_wallclock is used on x86_64.
> Your test shows that before this patch, kernel can boot on your system,
> but can not boot after that?
>
> Best Regards,
> Huang Ying
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Huang Ying
Yes that is correct, i cant boot after this patch was applied, but
former to this patch, my system would boot.
William
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists