[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091126081237.GA31034@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:12:37 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the tip tree
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the workqueues tree got a conflict in
> kernel/sched.c between commit eae0c9dfb534cb3449888b9601228efa6480fdb5
> ("sched: Fix and clean up rate-limit newidle code") from the tip tree and
> commit 710c15b748f5ce9c573cc047f419cf007a677a9a ("sched: refactor
> try_to_wake_up() and implement try_to_wake_up_local()") from the
> workqueues tree.
Tejun,
Please submit scheduler patches to the scheduler tree. Such level of
refactoring of a critical scheduler component needs to go through the
regular scheduler channels. This is a frequently modified piece of code
and conflicts are likely in the future.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists