[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1259199068.6186.33.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:31:08 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: fix set_task_cpu() and provide an unlocked
runqueue variant
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 02:01 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 19:27 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I've got to ask, what's that barrier for?
>
> It's a leftover from frustrated bug hunting.
To be more specific, I put it there to ensure that min_vruntimes are
stable. I figured that if try_to_wake_up() needs a barrier to look at
task->state, I had better do the same for the runqueues.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists