[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091126103234.806a4982.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:32:34 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: vedran.furac@...il.com
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom_kill: use rss value instead of vm size for badness
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:10:12 +0100
Vedran Furač <vedran.furac@...il.com> wrote:
> Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> Hi all!
>
> > lengthy discussion on something I think is quite obviously better and
> > I tried to change a couple of years back already (rss instead of
> > total_vm).
>
> Now that 2.6.32 is almost out, is it possible to get OOMK fixed in
> 2.6.33 so that I could turn overcommit on (overcommit_memory=0) again
> without fear of loosing my work?
>
I'll try fork-bomb detector again. That will finally help your X.org.
But It may lose 2.6.33.
Adding new counter to mm_struct is now rejected because of scalability, so
total work will need more time (than expected).
I'm sorry I can't get enough time in these weeks.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists