[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1F6BE32B-13EE-4FB4-96AD-D4526F435777@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:39:09 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <superm1@...ntu.com>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>,
Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@...telmus.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure
On Nov 26, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> wrote:
> Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> writes:
>
>> In what way the key interface is unsufficient for delivering button
>> events?
>
> At present: 128 different keys only (RC5: one group).
Where did this limitation come from? We have more than 256 keycodes
already _defined_ in the input core and we can add more if needed.
> One remote per
> device only.
Why would you want more? One physical device usually corresponds to a
logical device. If you have 2 remotes create 2 devices.
> The protocol itself doesn't have the above limitations, but has
> others,
> with are acceptable for key input.
> --
> Krzysztof Halasa
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists