linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BDccCqq3jFB@christoph>
Date:	26 Nov 2009 23:05:00 +0100
From:	lirc@...telmus.de (Christoph Bartelmus)
To:	mchehab@...hat.com
Cc:	superm1@...ntu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure

Hi Mauro,

on 26 Nov 09 at 18:59, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Christoph Bartelmus wrote:
[...]
>>> lircd supports input layer interface. Yet, patch 3/3 exports both devices
>>> that support only pulse/space raw mode and devices that generate scan
>>> codes via the raw mode interface. It does it by generating artificial
>>> pulse codes.
>>
>> Nonsense! There's no generation of artificial pulse codes in the drivers.
>> The LIRC interface includes ways to pass decoded IR codes of arbitrary
>> length to userspace.

> I might have got wrong then a comment in the middle of the
> imon_incoming_packet() of the SoundGraph iMON IR patch:

Indeed, you got it wrong.
As I already explained before, this device samples the signal at a  
constant rate and delivers the current level in a bit-array. This data is  
then condensed to pulse/space data.

Christoph
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/