[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B0E1E2F.9080604@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:20:31 +0800
From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, czoccolo@...il.com
CC: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] cfq: Make use of service count to estimate the rb_key offset
Hi Jens, Czoccolo
For the moment, different workload cfq queues are put into different
service trees. But CFQ still uses "busy_queues" to estimate rb_key
offset when inserting a cfq queue into a service tree. I think this
isn't appropriate, and it should make use of service tree count to do
this estimation. This patch is for for-2.6.33 branch.
Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>
---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 1bcbd8c..467981e 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -600,11 +600,15 @@ cfq_find_next_rq(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,
static unsigned long cfq_slice_offset(struct cfq_data *cfqd,
struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
{
+ struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree;
+
+ service_tree = service_tree_for(cfqq_prio(cfqq), cfqq_type(cfqq), cfqd);
+
/*
* just an approximation, should be ok.
*/
- return (cfqd->busy_queues - 1) * (cfq_prio_slice(cfqd, 1, 0) -
- cfq_prio_slice(cfqd, cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq), cfqq->ioprio));
+ return service_tree->count * (cfq_prio_slice(cfqd, 1, 0) -
+ cfq_prio_slice(cfqd, cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq), cfqq->ioprio));
}
/*
--
1.5.4.rc3
--
Regards
Gui Jianfeng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists