| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:31:46 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> Cc: Andy Walls <awalls@...ix.net>, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com>, Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@...telmus.de>, "j@...nau.net" <j@...nau.net>, "jarod@...hat.com" <jarod@...hat.com>, "jarod@...sonet.com" <jarod@...sonet.com>, "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, "maximlevitsky@...il.com" <maximlevitsky@...il.com>, "mchehab@...hat.com" <mchehab@...hat.com>, "stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de" <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>, "superm1@...ntu.com" <superm1@...ntu.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? On Nov 29, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> wrote: > 1. Do we agree that a lirc (-style) kernel-user interface is needed at > least? > > 2. Is there any problem with lirc kernel-user interface? > > If the answer for #1 is "yes" and for #2 is "no" then perhaps we merge > the Jarod's lirc patches (at least the core) so at least the > non-controversial part is done? Isn't the meat of Jarod's patch the lirc interface? -- > Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists