[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1259603798.29779.293.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:56:38 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: warning: massive change to conditional coding style in net?
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 05:36 -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Over the past several days, David Miller (with help from Joe Perches)
> made sweeping changes to the format of conditional statements in the
> net tree -- the equivalent of mass patches that change spaces.
> This makes writing patches for multiple versions of the tree very
> difficult, and will make future pullups problematic.
If it makes getting tcp cookies accepted difficult,
a reversion is simple. That style isn't as important.
I think writing a single set of patches for multiple
versions of linux is not feasible. Feature changes
occur in kernel source daily.
> if (condition
> && condition
> && (condition
> || condition
> || condition)) {
The above is my personally preferred style.
> if (condition &&
> condition && (condition || condition ||
> condition)) {
Except for the odd spacing, this is the significant
majority of net/ style.
The leading style was < 10%. It's less now.
> Miller (with Perches) changed hundreds (thousands?) of these to
> trailing form. This results in a number of hilarious examples --
> lines with both leading and trailing, lines with only &&, etc.
Nearly all existing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists