[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091201103351.GA6685@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:33:51 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/2] Futex fault injection
* Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@...ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch set adds fault injection for futex subsystem. It adds
> faults at places where reading/writing from user space can return
> EFAULT. This will be useful in testing any significant change to futex
> subsystem.
Instead of this unacceptably ugly and special-purpose debugfs interface,
please extend perf events to allow event injection. Some other places in
the kernel (which deal with rare events) want/need this capability too.
A good way to do it would be to define tracepoints in these places via a
new kind of TRACE_EVENT(), which would also define an event_injected_*()
callback to use.
So, for example, instead of:
if (futex_should_fail(&fail_futex_efault, 1))
return -EFAULT;
if (unlikely(!access_ok(rw, uaddr, sizeof(u32)))) {
trace_get_futex_key_efault(uaddr);
return -EFAULT;
}
We'd have something like:
if (unlikely(!access_ok(rw, uaddr, sizeof(u32))) ||
event_injected_get_futex_key_efault()) {
trace_get_futex_key_efault(uaddr);
return -EFAULT;
}
And each separate event injection point could thus be triggered
individually.
To use this there would be a separate facility to inject events - via
the perf events ioctl for example.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists