[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091201140041.GW9482@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 07:00:41 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Liuweni <qingshenlwy@...il.com>
Cc: strongzgy <strongzgy@...il.com>, xgr178 <xgr178@....com>,
Liu Hui <onlyflyer@...il.com>, viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, jack <jack@...e.cz>,
npiggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/3]fs/inode: iunique() Optimize Performance
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 09:21:32PM +0800, Liuweni wrote:
> Hi Matthew Wilcox:
> I got the code note as the following. if there is no performance problem,
> maybe the code note need update.
>
>
> ------
> * BUGS:
> * With a large number of inodes live on the file system this function
> * currently becomes quite slow.
>
I don't believe that comment is correct. In any case, your optimisation
wouldn't make a lick of difference to the speed; it's a single comparison
in a loop which also calculates a hash, makes a function call, and walks
the length of a hash chain.
The old adage about debugging code, not comments applies here. Don't take
somebody else's word for it that there's a performance problem here.
Devise a test to demonstrate the performance problem. Otherwise, how
will you know if you solved it?
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists