[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B154B29.1030807@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:58:17 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: seeing strange values for tcp sk_rmem_alloc
Chris Friesen a écrit :
> I'm hoping someone might be able to explain some odd behaviour that I'm
> seeing.
>
> Some of our developers wanted to be able to see how much of their rx
> socket buffer space was in use, so I added the following to sock_ioctl()
>
>
> case SIOCGSKRMEMALLOC:
> {
> int tmp;
> err = -EINVAL;
> if(!sock->sk)
> break;
> tmp = atomic_read(&sock->sk->sk_rmem_alloc);
> err = copy_to_user(argp, &tmp, sizeof(tmp));
> break;
> }
>
> To validate it, I wrote a testcase that opened a tcp socket, then looped
> sending 2k of data at a time to it and calling the above ioctl to check
> the sk_rmem_alloc value (without ever reading from the socket).
>
> The results were odd--I've copied them below. Can anyone explain how I
> can send 20K of data but sk_rmem_alloc still only shows 4.8K used, then
> it suddenly jumps by a lot on the next packet to something that more
> reflects reality, then repeats that pattern again? Is there some
> additional buffering happening somewhere in the TCP stack?
>
Me wondering why you think sk_rmem_alloc is about TX side.
Its used in RX path. rmem means ReadMemory.
You can send 1 Gbytes of data, and sk_rmem_alloc doesnt change, if your
TCP stream is unidirectionnal.
sk_rmem_alloc grows when skb are queued into receive queue
sk_rmem_alloc shrinks when application reads this receive queue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists