[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B155252.1040604@nortel.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:28:50 -0600
From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: seeing strange values for tcp sk_rmem_alloc
On 12/01/2009 10:58 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Me wondering why you think sk_rmem_alloc is about TX side.
> Its used in RX path. rmem means ReadMemory.
Yep, I realize this.
> You can send 1 Gbytes of data, and sk_rmem_alloc doesnt change, if your
> TCP stream is unidirectionnal.
>
> sk_rmem_alloc grows when skb are queued into receive queue
> sk_rmem_alloc shrinks when application reads this receive queue.
I realize this. I sent the data from a socket to itself. It could just
as easily be done with two tcp sockets. The important thing is that I
control both the tx and rx sides, so I know how much data should be
present in the rx queue at any point in time.
The part that surprised me was that I could send multiple chunks of data
without sk_rmem_alloc changing on the socket to which the data was being
sent. Then it would jump up by a large amount (up to 20K) all at once.
I'm starting to suspect that the discrepency might have something to do
with the skb_copy_datagram_iovec() call in tcp_data_queue(), and how
skb_set_owner_r() is only called if "eaten" is <= 0. This could be
totally off-base though.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists