[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B1557CC.4060503@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:52:12 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: seeing strange values for tcp sk_rmem_alloc
Chris Friesen a écrit :
> I realize this. I sent the data from a socket to itself. It could just
> as easily be done with two tcp sockets. The important thing is that I
> control both the tx and rx sides, so I know how much data should be
> present in the rx queue at any point in time.
>
> The part that surprised me was that I could send multiple chunks of data
> without sk_rmem_alloc changing on the socket to which the data was being
> sent. Then it would jump up by a large amount (up to 20K) all at once.
>
> I'm starting to suspect that the discrepency might have something to do
> with the skb_copy_datagram_iovec() call in tcp_data_queue(), and how
> skb_set_owner_r() is only called if "eaten" is <= 0. This could be
> totally off-base though.
>
If you dont read() your socket, then skb_copy_datagram_iovec() is not called
But be careful of sender tcp stack : It might be delayed a bit,
because it waits for receiver to open its window (slow start)
You probably need something like
while (1) {
send(fd1, buffer, 2Kbytes);
sleep(2); // let tcp stack flush its write buffers
display_sk_rmem_alloc(fd2);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists