[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091202081102.GA16218@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:11:02 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...el.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/24] HWPOISON: limit hwpoison injector to known page
types
* Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> --- linux-mm.orig/mm/hwpoison-inject.c 2009-11-30 20:44:41.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-mm/mm/hwpoison-inject.c 2009-11-30 20:58:20.000000000 +0800
> @@ -3,16 +3,41 @@
> #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/swap.h>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> static struct dentry *hwpoison_dir;
>
> static int hwpoison_inject(void *data, u64 val)
> {
i'd like to raise a continuing conceptual objection against the ad-hoc
and specialistic nature of the event injection in the
mm/memory-failure*.c code. It should probably be using a standardized
interface by integrating with perf events - as i outlined it before.
Where needed perf events should be extended - we can help with that.
There's no point in having scattered pieces of incompatible (and
user-ABI affecting) infrastructure all around the kernel.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists