linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: allow cross compiling of perf tools

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:13:37 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: allow cross compiling of perf tools


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 21:24 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 20:11 +0000, Jamie Iles wrote:
> > > For embedded systems we need to cross compile applications on
> > > the build machine. Use the CROSS_COMPILE variable like the kernel
> > > itself.
> > > 
> > > Additionally, we can't use uname to determine whether we should
> > > build for 64 bit. Use the -dumpmachine flag of GCC to determine
> > > the target arch.
> > 
> > Hmm, and here I though Michael already send something similar to this..
> > but apparently I can't really find it
> 
> Ah, I'm turning senile, was looking at the wrong kernel tree.
> 
> Your patch is against something ancient too ;-)

yep. Jamie, you can find the latest perf code at:

  http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README

mind checking it?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/