[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B15C828.4080407@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:51:36 +0800
From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
nauman@...gle.com, dpshah@...gle.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
ryov@...inux.co.jp, fernando@....ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@...jp.nec.com,
taka@...inux.co.jp, jmoyer@...hat.com, righi.andrea@...il.com,
m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com, czoccolo@...il.com, Alan.Brunelle@...com
Subject: Re: Block IO Controller V4
Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> This is V4 of the Block IO controller patches on top of "for-2.6.33" branch
> of block tree.
>
> A consolidated patch can be found here:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/vgoyal/io-controller/blkio-controller/blkio-controller-v4.patch
>
Hi Vivek,
It seems this version doesn't work very well for "direct(O_DIRECT) sequence read" mode.
For example, you can create group A and group B, then assign weight 100 to group A and
weight 400 to group B, and you run "direct sequence read" workload in group A and B
simultaneously. Ideally, we should see 1:4 disk time differentiation for group A and B.
But actually, I see almost 1:2 disk time differentiation for group A and B. I'm looking
into this issue.
BTW, V3 works well for this case.
Thanks,
Gui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists