lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B178DD9.7040502@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:07:21 +0800
From:	Danny Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: reboot_fixup_32.c add missing pci_dev_put

On 12/03/2009 01:14 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * H. Peter Anvin<hpa@...or.com>  wrote:
>
>> On 12/02/2009 02:09 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> * Xiaotian Feng<dfeng@...hat.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> pci_get_device increments reference count to the found pci device,
>>>> that should be decremented using pci_dev_put.
>>>
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot_fixups_32.c
>>>> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ void mach_reboot_fixups(void)
>>>>   			continue;
>>>>
>>>>   		cur->reboot_fixup(dev);
>>>> +		pci_dev_put(dev);
>>>
>>> Does this matter in practice? We are about to reboot. (but if it's
>>> cleaner to do it like this or if there's some real bug fixed by this
>>> then please spell it out in the changelog.)
>>>
>>
>> Even if it doesn't actually matter, doing things cleanly makes it
>> easier to handle failure scenarios, possibly that are discovered in
>> the future.
>
> certainly - but it would be nice to know whether there's any other
> reason for this but cleanliness/consistency.

Just for consistency:-) pci_get_device will increase the ref count of 
found device,
then we should use pci_dev_put to decrease the ref count although we're 
going to reset soon.
I should point out this in my changelog, sorry for the unclear changelog.

>
> 	Ingo
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ