[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091202171422.GB28061@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:14:22 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: reboot_fixup_32.c add missing pci_dev_put
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 12/02/2009 02:09 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> pci_get_device increments reference count to the found pci device,
> >> that should be decremented using pci_dev_put.
> >
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/reboot_fixups_32.c
> >> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ void mach_reboot_fixups(void)
> >> continue;
> >>
> >> cur->reboot_fixup(dev);
> >> + pci_dev_put(dev);
> >
> > Does this matter in practice? We are about to reboot. (but if it's
> > cleaner to do it like this or if there's some real bug fixed by this
> > then please spell it out in the changelog.)
> >
>
> Even if it doesn't actually matter, doing things cleanly makes it
> easier to handle failure scenarios, possibly that are discovered in
> the future.
certainly - but it would be nice to know whether there's any other
reason for this but cleanliness/consistency.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists