[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1NG9iu-0002jR-1r@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:19:48 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, jlayton@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jamie@...reable.org, pavel@....cz, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
duaneg@...da.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vfs: force reval on dentry of bind mounted files on FS_REVAL_DOT filesystems
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > The only worry I have is that this adds an extra branch in a very hot
> > codepath (do_lookup). An error can't be returned, as you note, and
> > for bind mounted directories d_invalidate() will not succeed: the
> > directory is busy, it's referenced by the mount.
>
> Not true. d_mountpoint is false, so d_invalidate can succeed.
Have a look at the code. d_invalidate() doesn't check for a
mountpoint, it checks the refcount. It needs to keep the directory
dentry hashed if it's in any way reachable other than from the cache
(file descriptor, cwd, mount, etc).
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists