[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200912041036.36686.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:36:35 -0700
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To: djwong@...ibm.com
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, Crane Cai <crane.cai@....com>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] acpi: support IBM SMBus CMI devices
On Friday 04 December 2009 10:06:21 am Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:36:19PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:30:01 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:03:32PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm only half please with this. You change the function named, but it
> > > > doesn't follow the calling convention of acpi_dock_match(), which is a
> > > > little confusing.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, I will need an ack from the ACPI people before I can pick this
> > > > patch. Or maybe they should even push it upstream themselves.
>
> Len/Bjorn: Any opinion on this ACPI quirk patch to make i2c-scmi work on IBM
> systems? I think the i2c-scmi part is in Jean's tree, but I still need this
> second patch to the ACPI code itself. Did you pick it up, or should I resend?
I'm a little confused as to where we left things. Can you repost
the current series in a new thread? It looks like there might be
places that use "SMBUSIBM" when they should use ACPI_SMBUS_IBM_HID.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists