lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200912042218.11410.oliver@neukum.org>
Date:	Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:18:11 +0100
From:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, stable@...nel.org,
	Rickard Bellini <rickard.bellini@...csson.com>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	Torgny Johansson <torgny.johansson@...csson.com>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver core: fix race in dev_driver_string

Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2009 21:57:50 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > > 1. am I supposed to get a reference just so that I can use dev_err?
> > >
> > > No, you should already have a reference on the device when doing the
> > > call, right?
> >
> > No, why? Consider this:
> >
> > int write(...)
> > {
> > 	...
> > 	mutex_lock(&instance->lock);
> > 	if (instance->disconnected) {
> > 		dev_dbg(instance->dev,"writing to disconnected device");
> > 		rv = -ENODEV;
> > 	} else {
> > 		res = usb_submit_urb(...);
> > 		rv = res < 0 ? -EIO : count;
> > 	}
> > 	mutex_unlock(&instance->lock);
> > 	return rv;
> > }
> >
> > void disconnect(...)
> > {
> > 	...
> > 	mutex_lock(&instance->lock);
> > 	instance->disconnected = 1;
> > 	usb_kill_urb(...);
> > 	usb_kill_urb(...);
> > 	mutex_unlock(&instance->lock);
> > }
> >
> > This would be perfectly valid code without any references taken save
> > for the pesky dev_dbg()
> 
> Whoever calls write() must possess a valid reference.  Otherwise
> instance might already be deallocated when write() starts, causing an
> oops well before the call to dev_dbg().

He needs a valid reference to "instance", not to the device. In fact
he may do IO to the device only if he knows it hasn't been disconnected.
 
> Typically the driver would take a reference during open() and drop it
> during close().

You can do that but then you must not do IO prior to open() or after
close(). That is you must actually wait for IO to finish in close() and
cannot prefill your buffers before open().

	Regards
		Oliver

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ