| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:10:34 -0500 From: Andy Walls <awalls@...ix.net> To: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com> Cc: Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@...telmus.de>, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, j@...nau.net, jarod@...hat.com, jarod@...sonet.com, khc@...waw.pl, kraxel@...hat.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, mchehab@...hat.com, superm1@...ntu.com Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 20:48 -0500, Andy Walls wrote: > On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 19:28 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@...telmus.de> wrote: > > > BTW, I just came across a XMP remote that seems to generate 3x64 bit scan > > > codes. Anyone here has docs on the XMP protocol? > > > > Assuming a general purpose receiver (not one with fixed hardware > > decoding), is it important for Linux to receive IR signals from all > > possible remotes no matter how old or obscure? Google reveals that XMP is somewhat new, proprietary, and not limited to remotes: http://www.uei.com/html.php?page_id=89 UEI is apparently the company responsible for the "One for All" brand of remote controls: http://www.uei.com/html.php?page_id=62 Here's some random tech details about one XMP remote: http://irtek.wikidot.com/remotecomcastxmp Regards, Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists