lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B1B0D40.3040209@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:47:44 +0100
From:	Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC:	lenb@...nel.org, astarikovskiy@...e.de, mchehab@...radead.org,
	linville@...driver.com, miklos@...redi.hu, davem@...emloft.net,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	avi@...hat.com, mtosatti@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/31] Constify struct file_operations for 2.6.32 v1

Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 03:50:23AM +0100, Emese Revfy wrote:
>> Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 01:02:59AM +0100, Emese Revfy wrote:
>>>> -static struct file_operations ptmx_fops;
>>>> +static const struct file_operations ptmx_fops = {
>>>> +	.llseek		= no_llseek,
>>>> +	.read		= tty_read,
>>>> +	.write		= tty_write,
>>>> +	.poll		= tty_poll,
>>>> +	.unlocked_ioctl	= tty_ioctl,
>>>> +	.compat_ioctl	= tty_compat_ioctl,
>>>> +	.open		= ptmx_open,
>>>> +	.release	= tty_release,
>>>> +	.fasync		= tty_fasync,
>>>> +};
>>> You just made these functions all global, for no real good reason.  Why
>>> did you do this?
>> I think this is the only way to make ptmx_fops const, provided we want to. 
> 
> Why do we want to?

Because I saw that checkpatch.pl itself tries to ensure the same I went
through the whole tree looking for non-const file_operations structures
and tried to make them const as best as I could. If you think making
ptmx_fops const is not worth the effort I will remove it from the patch.
--
Emese
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ