linux-kernel - timer interrupt stucks using tickless kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:25:12 +0000
From:	"Ioannis Kyriakopoulos" <johnkyr83@...mail.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: timer interrupt stucks using tickless kernel

Hi all,

I have configured my kernel (2.6.31.6) so that I get periodic ticks from
the timer interrupt (i.e. tickless is not configured) with a rate determined
by the HZ value. I've also checked the "high resolution timer support"
and also SMP support. The posblem is that the timer is getting incremented 
very slowly (way slower than the HZ value), just like it would be if the 
kernel was tickless. Is there an explanation for that? How can I get
periodic
timer ticks?

AFAI understand, the HPET timer is used through the IO-APIC controller to
trigger the processors (N.B. if the "High Resolution Timer Support" option
wasn't checked, the timer used would  be PIT, right?) and each processor's
LAPIC timer is used for time keeping. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Another question is how the LAPIC timner's rate is determined? In my case,
it seams that an interurpt by LAPIC timer is generated very appoximately
0.25 sec (that is HZ which is 1000 * 4) but I can't understand why.

Thanks in advance.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/