[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0912071720520.15109@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:22:16 +0100 (CET)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: "Tung, Chien Tin" <chien.tin.tung@...el.com>
Cc: "Latif, Faisal" <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] drivers/infiniband: correct size computation
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Tung, Chien Tin wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out the bug.
>
> > /* Remap the PCI registers in adapter BAR0 to kernel VA space */
> >- mmio_regs = ioremap_nocache(pci_resource_start(pcidev, BAR_0), sizeof(mmio_regs));
> >+ mmio_regs = ioremap_nocache(pci_resource_start(pcidev, BAR_0),
> >+ sizeof(*mmio_regs));
> > if (mmio_regs == NULL) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Unable to remap BAR0\n");
> > ret = -EIO;
>
> mmio_regs is initialized to NULL at the top of the function so
> *mmio_regs wouldn't be a good idea. Instead of sizeof(*mmio_regs) use
> pci_resource_len(pcidev, BAR_0). If you can recreate the patch with
> this change I will ack it.
When you say that it isn't a good idea, do you mean that the result is
wrong, or that it looks odd? I didn't think sizeof looked at the value,
but only at the type?
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists