[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <603F8A3875DCE940BA37B49D0A6EA0AE3CE36C9F@azsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:38:55 -0700
From: "Tung, Chien Tin" <chien.tin.tung@...el.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
CC: "Latif, Faisal" <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] drivers/infiniband: correct size computation
>> > /* Remap the PCI registers in adapter BAR0 to kernel VA space */
>> >- mmio_regs = ioremap_nocache(pci_resource_start(pcidev, BAR_0), sizeof(mmio_regs));
>> >+ mmio_regs = ioremap_nocache(pci_resource_start(pcidev, BAR_0),
>> >+ sizeof(*mmio_regs));
>> > if (mmio_regs == NULL) {
>> > printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Unable to remap BAR0\n");
>> > ret = -EIO;
>>
>> mmio_regs is initialized to NULL at the top of the function so
>> *mmio_regs wouldn't be a good idea. Instead of sizeof(*mmio_regs) use
>> pci_resource_len(pcidev, BAR_0). If you can recreate the patch with
>> this change I will ack it.
>
>When you say that it isn't a good idea, do you mean that the result is
>wrong, or that it looks odd? I didn't think sizeof looked at the value,
>but only at the type?
I misspoke on the problem. Mmio_regs is declared as a void pointer:
void __iomem *mmio_regs = NULL;
Thus pci_resource_len(pcidev, BAR_0) is the correct fix.
Chien
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists