[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2375c9f90912090128k70f54ee1n99421caa81c53a8f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:28:09 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: handle irq0 special only on x86
2009/12/9 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>:
> I just noticed this when digging in the irq handling. At least for arm
> this doesn't make sense. Not sure if x86 is the only arch this test
> is valid for, but probably it is.
No, it is not.
Try grep -Inr 'irq0' arch/*/kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> ---
> kernel/irq/spurious.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
> index 22b0a6e..4996b66 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
> @@ -199,8 +199,10 @@ try_misrouted_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc,
> if (irqfixup < 2)
> return 0;
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_X86)
> if (!irq)
> return 1;
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * Since we don't get the descriptor lock, "action" can
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists