[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b2b86520912100900p5796bc35q702af615d3f27a0c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:00:04 +0000
From: Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@...glemail.com>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@...il.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lenb@...nel.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Toshiba Bluetooth enabler (v3)
On 12/10/09, Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@...il.com> wrote:
> On 12/09/2009 02:17 PM, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>>> Fixed, this version only calls the enabler if the switch is at ON at
>>> resume time.
>>
>> Ah... I think add() has the same problem as well though? I.e. the
>> driver will not work if the switch is disabled at load time.
>>
>> I would change it in enable() (and then try to think of a new name for
>> it, maybe try_enable()).
>
> Sorta did that, it should do the right thing in all those cases now.
Great, looks good.
> Otherwise I am pretty pleased with it now. Unless there's strong
> objections, I'd say it's good to go.
>
> Cheers,
> Jes
I did question "depends on RFKILL". If you manually configure a
kernel, you will miss "If you have a modern Toshiba laptop with a
Bluetooth and an RFKill switch (such as the Portege R500), say Y."
unless you enable RFKILL first. (Which is unnecessary since the
driver will work exactly the same with RFKILL=n). I wouldn't call it
a strong objection, but it would be nice to hear the reason you
included this dependency.
Everything else looks fine. Thanks for working on this.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists