[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091210181638.GA17986@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:16:38 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
utrace-devel <utrace-devel@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] In-kernel gdbstub based on utrace Infrastructure.
* Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> writes:
>
> > [...] Since the speed of development in this area is truly glacial
> > at the moment and the practical advantages that i can experience
> > personally (directly as a Linux user and indirectly as a maintainer)
> > are miniscule so far, caution is warranted IMO. [...]
>
> If the "caution" you suggest is operationally equivalent to
> discouraging even miniscule improvements, is it any wonder that
> progress is glacial?
I think you might be mixing up cause and causation ;-)
> The gdbstub prototype was constructed for two reasons: to demonstrate
> utrace usage now, and in the future to be incrementally useful (over
> ptrace, by moving into fast kernel-space operations like
> multithreading control, gdb-tracepoint support, other stuff). #1 is
> about done. With respect to #2, we can certainly commit to ongoing
> work on improvements, provided the community shows interest and
> goodwill.
What i'd like to see is measurable benefits to users, developers and
maintainers. I'd like to see the same for SystemTap too btw.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists