linux-kernel - phoronix test, openssl bad performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:15:57 +0100
From:	Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: phoronix test,  openssl bad performance

hi,

In the openssl test, Solaris is 2.4X times faster than Linux.

The hardware was:
ThinkPad T61 with Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 + 2GB RAM

OS (all 32-bit):
Build 127 of OpenSolaris 2010.02 with 5.11 kernel + GCC 4.3.2
Fedora 12 Linux 2.6.31 kernel + GCC 4.4.2
Ubuntu 9.10 Linux 2.6.31 kernel + GCC 4.4.1

"All operating systems were left with their default options during
the installation process and left with the default set of packages
for each operating system except for the obvious need to install
some dependencies for the different tests."

In Linux, it means AppArmor/SELinux and audit enabled, and etc...

the test:
openssl-0.9.8k, compiled with ./config no-zlib; make
command: $ openssl speed rsa4096 -multi $NUM_CPU_CORES


results: http://www.phoronix.com/data/img/results/freebsd8_benchmarks/20.png

Solaris     72.67 sign/s
Linux     ~=30    sign/s
(FreeBSD    20.3  sign/s)


complete article at http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_benchmarks

-thanks-
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/