linux-kernel - Re: phoronix test, openssl bad performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <877hsumqpj.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date:	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:03:52 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: phoronix test,  openssl bad performance

Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com> writes:

> hi,
>
> In the openssl test, Solaris is 2.4X times faster than Linux.
>
> The hardware was:
> ThinkPad T61 with Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 + 2GB RAM
>
> OS (all 32-bit):
> Build 127 of OpenSolaris 2010.02 with 5.11 kernel + GCC 4.3.2
> Fedora 12 Linux 2.6.31 kernel + GCC 4.4.2
> Ubuntu 9.10 Linux 2.6.31 kernel + GCC 4.4.1

You should probably report that to Fedora through their bugzilla, 
it's unlikely to be a linux kernel problem.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/