| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091211125053.2bf95238@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:50:53 +0000 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: tytso@....edu Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stephane.marchesin@...il.com, madman2003@...il.com, xavier.bestel@...e.fr, airlied@...ux.ie, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net Subject: Re: [git pull] drm On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:45:41 -0500 tytso@....edu wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 08:20:57PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Well the main thing was I wasn't mean to discuss possible legal issues > > and still don't have permission, you know as well as I do once lawyers are > > involved you have to keep out of things until they deal with them. > > The thing which really surprises me is that if there are legally > dubious issues, why on *earth* did Red Hat allow Fedora to ship said > code? The thing which really surprises me is that if there are legal questions involved why on *earth* do people keep asking them on public mailing lists when they know the lawyers views/opinions/decisions will not be publishable there ? Ted, you of all people know that if you want to get an answer that isn't the way to get it. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists