linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Defer skb allocation -- add destroy buffers function for virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200912141355.59678.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:55:59 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
Cc:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Defer skb allocation -- add destroy buffers function for virtio

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:03:25 pm Shirley Ma wrote:
> Signed-off-by: <xma@...ibm.com>

Hi Shirley,

   These patches look quite close.  More review to follow :)

   This title needs revision.  It should start with virtio: (all the virtio
patches do, for easy identification after merge), eg:

	Subject: virtio: Add destroy callback for unused buffers

It also needs a commit message which explains the problem and the solution.
Something like this:

	There's currently no way for a virtio driver to ask for unused
	buffers, so it has to keep a list itself to reclaim them at shutdown.
	This is redundant, since virtio_ring stores that information.  So
	add a new hook to do this: virtio_net will be the first user.

> -------------
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index c708ecc..bb5eb7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,16 @@ static struct page *get_a_page(struct virtnet_info *vi, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  	return p;
>  }
>  
> +static void virtio_net_free_pages(void *buf)
> +{
> +	struct page *page, *next;
> +
> +	for (page = buf; page; page = next) {
> +		next = (struct page *)page->private;
> +		__free_pages(page, 0);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void skb_xmit_done(struct virtqueue *svq)
>  {
>  	struct virtnet_info *vi = svq->vdev->priv;

This belongs in one of the future patches: it will cause an unused warning
and is logically not part of this patch anyway.

> +static int vring_destroy_bufs(struct virtqueue *_vq, void (*destroy)(void *))
> +{
> +	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> +	void *buf;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +	int freed = 0;

unsigned int for return and freed counter?  Means changing prototype, but
negative return isn't useful here.

> +
> +	START_USE(vq);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < vq->vring.num; i++) {
> +		if (vq->data[i]) {
> +			/* detach_buf clears data, so grab it now. */
> +			buf = vq->data[i];
> +			detach_buf(vq, i);
> +			destroy(buf);
> +			freed++;

You could simplify this a bit, since the queue must be inactive:

	destroy(vq->data[i]);
	detach_buf(vq, i);
	freed++;

> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	END_USE(vq);
> +	return freed;

Perhaps add a:
	/* That should have freed everything. */
	BUG_ON(vq->num_free != vq->vring.num)

>  	void (*disable_cb)(struct virtqueue *vq);
>  	bool (*enable_cb)(struct virtqueue *vq);
> +	int (*destroy_bufs)(struct virtqueue *vq, void (*destory)(void *));

destory typo :)

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/