[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200912141724.49034.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:24:48 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] Defer skb allocation -- new skb_set calls & chain pages in virtio_net
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:13:02 pm Shirley Ma wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Shirley Ma <xma@...ibm.com>
I don't think there's a good way of splitting this change across multiple
patches. And I don't think this patch will compile; I don't think we can
get rid of trim_pages yet.
We *could* first split the receive paths into multiple parts as you have
(eg. add_recvbuf_big etc), then actually rewrite them, but that's too much
work to refactor the code twice.
So just roll all the driver changes into one patch; so you will have two
patches: one which creates the destroy_bufs API for virtio, and one which
uses it in the virtio_net driver.
> +static struct sk_buff *skb_goodcopy(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct page **page,
> + unsigned int *len)
This actually allocates an skb, and transfers the first page to it (via copy
and possibly the first fragment). skb_from_page() perhaps?
> + hdr_len = sizeof(hdr->hdr);
> + offset = sizeof(struct padded_vnet_hdr);
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(hdr, p, hdr_len);
> +
> + *len -= hdr_len;
Perhaps you should return NULL here as an error if *len was < hdr_len?
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists